International Collaboration  For Participatory Research
  • Home
  • About
    • Goals and Objectives
    • Structure
  • News
  • Getting Involved
    • Endorsing Members >
      • Endorsing Members
      • Members' videos >
        • Upcoming
    • Annual Meeting >
      • AWM 2022: Huelva, Spain
      • AWM 2021: Virtual
      • AWM 2020: Virtual
      • AWM 2019: Baltimore >
        • AWM 2019: Baltimore
        • Pre-conference 2019
      • AWM 2018: Edmonton >
        • AWM 2018: Edmonton >
          • AWM 2018: Meeting Minutes
        • Pre-conference 2018
      • AWM 2017: Ireland >
        • AWM 2017: Ireland
        • Meeting Minutes AWM 2017
        • Pre-conference 2017 >
          • Pre-conference registration
      • AWM 2016: Malmö >
        • AWM 2016: Malmö
        • Pre-conference 2016
      • AWM 2015: Berlin >
        • AWM 2015: Berlin
        • AWM 2015: Meeting Minutes
        • PHOTOS: AWM 2015
        • Pre-conference
      • AWM 2014: Niteroi >
        • Pre-meeting event
      • AWM 2013: Northumbria
      • AWM 2012: Coimbra
      • AWM 2011: Toronto
      • AWM 2010: Berlin
    • Focus Areas: Overview >
      • Ethics in Participatory Health Research
      • Evaluation of Participatory Health Research
      • Interactive Knowledgebase and Impact
      • Kids in Action >
        • 'Kids in Action' Initiative Registration
        • Manifesto of Values
        • Project Summaries: Updated Sept 2019
        • Helpful Links and Resources
      • Literature Reviews
      • Theories and Methodologies of PHR
      • Training in Participatory Health Research
    • Projects
    • PHR Courses Around the World >
      • PPI/PHR Courses
      • ICPHR International Course
  • Resources
    • ICPHR Resources
    • Position Papers & Discussion Papers
    • Reviews
    • Members Publications
  • Networks
    • Colaboracion Internacional por la Investigacion Participativa en Salud
    • Netzwerk Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung - PartNet
    • UK Participatory Research Network
  • Contact Us
  • New Page

New publication: Organizational Participatory Research

11/6/2017

0 Comments

 
Please see the newly published article below on Organizational Participatory Research by a few ICPHR members:

Bush, P. L., Pluye, P., Loignon, C., Granikov, V., Wright, M. T., Pelletier, J. F., ... & Repchinsky, C. (2017). Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them. Implementation Science, 12(1), 119.

Abstract:
Background

In health, organizational participatory research (OPR) refers to health organization members participating in research decisions, with university researchers, throughout a study. This non-academic partner contribution to the research may take the form of consultation or co-construction. A drawback of OPR is that it requires more time from all those involved, compared to non-participatory research approaches; thus, understanding the added value of OPR, if any, is important. Thus, we sought to assess whether the OPR approach leads to benefits beyond what could be achieved through traditional research.

Methods
We identified, selected, and appraised OPR health literature, and at each stage, two team members independently reviewed and coded the literature. We used quantitative content analysis to transform textual data into reliable numerical codes and conducted a logistic regression to test the hypothesis that a co-construction type OPR study yields extra benefits with a greater likelihood than consultation-type OPR studies.

Results
From 8873 abstracts and 992 full text papers, we distilled a sample of 107 OPR studies. We found no difference between the type of organization members’ participation and the likelihood of exhibiting an extra benefit. However, the likelihood of an OPR study exhibiting at least one extra benefit is quadrupled when the impetus for the study comes from the organization, rather than the university researcher(s), or the organization and the university researcher(s) together (OR = 4.11, CI = 1.12–14.01). We also defined five types of extra benefits.

Conclusions
This review describes the types of extra benefits OPR can yield and suggests these benefits may occur if the organization initiates the OPR. Further, this review exposes a need for OPR authors to more clearly describe the type of non-academic partner participation in key research decisions throughout the study. Detailed descriptions will benefit others conducting OPR and allow for a re-examination of the relationship between participation and extra benefits in future reviews.
0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2023
    October 2022
    September 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    November 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Annual Working Meeting
    Educational Course
    Events
    Local Networks
    Members Projects
    Newsletter
    Position Paper
    Publication
    Website

Home
About
News
Getting Involved
Resources
Networks
Contact Us



The contents of this site are licensed under the Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0" Licence